South Africa lawyer nominated as UN rights chief
The Associated Press
Friday, July 25, 2008; 3:35 AM
Filed under: Human Rights
July 31, 2008 • 10:24 am 0
The Associated Press
Friday, July 25, 2008; 3:35 AM
Filed under: Human Rights
July 30, 2008 • 3:57 pm 0
Filed under: Immigratoin Reform
July 28, 2008 • 9:50 pm 0
Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Asylum in the US, Human Rights, Immigratoin Reform, Laws, Social Engineering, Young Lawyers
• 3:40 pm 0
SC FIAT TO VEEP ON OATH ROW HIMALAYAN NEWS SERVICE KATHMANDU, JULY 28:
The Supreme Court today issued show cause notices to Vice President Paramananda Jha and Office of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet to clarify why the Vice President took the oath of office and secrecy in Hindi. A single bench of Justice Damodar Prasad Sharma directed the defendants to furnish an explanation in seven days. Considering the immunity provided by the constitution to the head of the state, the bench, however, did not issue any notice to President Dr Ram Baran Yadav, who administered the oath to the Vice President. Dr Yadav had read out the oath text in Nepali but Jha did his bit in Hindi. The bench added that there was no need to issue any stay order to prevent the Vice President from carrying out his duty as demanded by the petitioner, as the Vice President works only when the President was not there. Advocate Bal Krishna Neupane moved the court on Friday challenging Jha’s act as unconstitutional. Neupane has sought apex court’s order to annul his oath and ask him to take fresh oath in Nepali as per the interim constitution.
VP JHA DEFENDS HIS SWEARING IN HINDI
Even as students across the country have protested vice president Parmananda Jha for taking oath in Hindi language, he has defended his action. Talking to BBC Nepali Service, Friday, VP Jha said that Hindi is also a mother-tongue of (some community) in Nepal. “As per the census, there are around 200,000 people whose mother-tongue is Hindi,” VP Jha said. He also rejected accusations that using Hindi language would, in any way, undermine nationality and integrity. Although he himself is a native Maithili speaker, VP Jha said he chose to take oath in Hindi because it was a common language understood by Maithili, Bhojpuri, Awadhi and other lingual groups of Madhes region. Responding to the filing of a writ petition against his swearing in Hindi at the Supreme Court, VP Jha – who is a former judge – said he would abide by the court decision. He, however, claimed that his taking of oath in Hindi language had not breached the interim constitution. nepalnews.com sd Jul 26 08
CASE AGAINST VP FOR TAKING OATH IN HINDI
A writ petition has been registered at the Supreme Court Friday against Vice President Parmananda Jha for taking oath in Hindi instead of the national language Nepali. Advocate Bal Krishna Neupane filed the writ at the apex court demanding rejection of the oath taken by Jha and asking him to re-take it in Nepali language or be expelled from the post. The offices of the President, Vice President and Prime Minister are the opponents of the case filed today. Students have been demonstrating against Jha for taking oath in Hindi though he is a Maithili speaker. Few parties in the parliament have also opposed the action. nepalnews.com ia July 25 08
VEEP JHA SWEARING IN HINDI UNCONSTITUTIONAL: MAHARA
Vice President Parmananda Jha swearing in a tottering Hindi has not only invited ire from student and small political outfits but is now starting to be seen as an act of defiance against the nation with a senior Maoist leader claiming it to be against the interim constitution. CPN (Maoist) spokesperson Krishna Bahadur Mahara on Friday said that VP Jha taking the oath of office and secrecy in the national language of India has undermined Nepali nationhood and termed it “objectionable”. Mahara, who was attending a public screening of a movie based on the people’s war at the Biswojyoti Theatre in Kathmandu, also said VP Jha should have instead taken the oath in his mother-tongue (which is Maithali) or the national language of Nepal and said that the party would protest against this unfortunate incident. Mahara, the Minister for Information and Communication – who has resigned from the cabinet but whose resignation has not yet been approved – also said that the issue of VP Jha swearing in Hindi also cropped up during the 25 party meeting held, Thursday. Talking about the race for government formation, Mahara said that his party would stay in the opposition if the Nepali Congress, UML and MJF didn’t agree to the condition advanced by them–breaking of NC-UML-MJF alliance, formulation of common minimum programme and guarantee of government stability for two years. nepalnews.com July 25 08
FIRST DAY AT HIS JOB, VICE PREZ JHA SPARKS PROTESTS AFTER SWEARING IN HINDI
There were minor demonstrations across the country against the newly elected Vice President Parmananda Jha for taking oath of office and secrecy in Hindi language during the President and Vice-Presidential swearing in ceremony at Shital Niwas Wednesday.
Student organisations affiliated with different parties staged demonstrations in various parts of the capital Thursday against Vice President Jha taking the oath of office in a “foreign language”. They demanded that VP Jha publicly apologise for this. Similarly, locals of Gajuri in Dhading district barred vehicles from plying on the road by imposing transportation strike Thursday. They were apparently enraged by Vice President Jha taking oath in Hindi. They also said that this was a matter of grave concern which has put at risk the sovereignty of the country. Likewise, Chure Bhawar Ekata Samaj, a party which claims to work for the people of hilly origin living in the Terai, also obstructed traffic for more than an hour in the East-West highway passing through Saptari district. The transportation strike had caused a long traffic snarl in the highway, causing a great problem for passengers. In Butwal also local youths chanted slogans against the newly elected VP and blocked traffic in the major roads and intersections. There were reports of protests in Makwanpur, Rupandehi, Nawalparasi, Dadelhura and Tahahun also. President Dr Ram Baran Yadav, clad in the national custom, had taken the oath of office and secrecy in Nepali. However, when he administered the oath of office to his deputy Jha, who was clad in a dress many identify with Indian parliamentarians, the latter preferred to take it in Hindi, raising eyebrows among the high-level dignitaries and political leaders present there.According to an independent statistics, only 0.05 percent of people living in Terai speak Hindi. The majority of the people there speak Bhojpuri, Maithali, Avadhi and other local dialects. However, Madhesi leaders prefer to mostly speak in Hindi during the parliamentary proceedings saying that it is a “lingua franca” in Terai. nepalnews.com July 24 08
PRESIDENT YADAV, VP JHA SWORN IN
Amid a ceremony filled with pomp, newly elected President Dr Ram Baran Yadav and Vice President Paramananda Jha were sworn in at the presidential palace, Shital Niwas, Wednesday afternoon. Clad in Daura Suruwal, president Dr. Yadav was sworn in by Chief Justice Kedar Prasad Giri. He received a guard of honor from Nepali Army (NA). As per the constitution he is the supreme commander of NA. Subsequently, he visited the Office of the President and officially took over his duty as the first president of republic Nepal. Briefly talking to journalists at his office, President Yadav said he would dedicate himself to institutionalisation of republic, timely drafting of new constitution and maintain peace and communal harmony. President Yadav then administered the oath of office and secrecy to vice president Parmananda Jha who was clad in Dhoti-kurta. Jha took oath in Hindi language. Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala, acting chair of the Constituent Assembly K.B Gurung, ministers, heads of foreign diplomatic missions and heads of constitutional bodies were also present at the swearing ceremony. Top leaders of political parties and members of CA were also present on the occasion. Missing in action, however, was Maoist chairman Prachanda. nepalnews.com Jul 23 08
Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Laws, Legal Development, Social Engineering
July 23, 2008 • 9:57 am 0
| Peace process in peril: Prachanda | ||
| Himalayan News Service | ||
Kathmandu, July 22: • Maoists decide to be in opposition CPN-Maoist chairman Prachanda today said his party would sit on the opposition benches, as their presidential candidate lost yesterday’s historic run-off. |
||
Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety
July 22, 2008 • 4:04 pm 0
The Court Process
Source: http://www.asylumhelp.org/pages/legal5.htm
If you are referred to court, it means that you are in REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS, meaning the government is trying to deport you. It is critical that you find a lawyer to represent you in court. The Immigration Court will provide you with a list of legal providers. Sometimes it may be quite difficult to reach them by telephone, but RIF can help you in getting in touch with them.
You will be given a date to appear at the immigration court. The first time you appear, the appointment is called a MASTER CALENDAR. It is okay if you haven’t yet found a lawyer by this first date. You can tell the judge that you need more time to find a lawyer and he or she will give it to you.
You might have two or three master calendar appointments before the judge gives you a date for your individual hearing. At your individual hearing you will be asked many questions by your attorney, the government lawyer (called the Trial Attorney or TA) and by the judge. Often the judge will decide the case on the very same day as the individual hearing. Sometimes the judge needs more time to think and he or she will schedule another hearing for you to come back and hear the decision.
It is important to understand that the trial attorney represents the government. Often this means that he is trying to win the case, meaning he wants the judge to deny your case. This is not always the case, as many trial attorneys understand when a person has a strong case. It is simply important for you to understand that in representing the government, the trial attorney will ask you many questions about your history and experiences. The trial attorney is not your lawyer and therefore your best interest is not his or her priority. The judge is supposed to be objective and ask different questions in order to fully understand your history and story.
Who your judge is can make a big difference in your case. Some judges have a high rate of approval of asylum claims and some have a low rate. You can find out who your judge is by calling the following number: 1-800-898-7180. This number allows you to find out when your next court date is, who your judge is, and other information regarding your court process. If your attorney does not say anything about your judge, please ask.
Other Forms of Relief that can be Granted at the Immigration Court
As discussed above, granting asylum is discretionary and the judge can take things other than your claim into account. However, withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief are mandatory forms of relief.
What is withholding of removal and CAT?
If the judge determines that it is more likely than not that you will be tortured or suffer inhuman or degrading treatment as a punishment if returned to your home country, he or she cannot send you back to your country. The standard for granting withholding is tougher than asylum – for asylum you do not have to show that persecution is more likely than not. If you are granted withholding of removal, this means that you can work and live freely in the United States; however, you are ineligible for a green card and cannot travel outside of the United States. Winning withholding does not prevent you from adjusting your status, or getting a green card, in another way, such as marriage to a United States citizen. CAT relief is also a form of mandatory relief and means that you cannot be sent back home. If the immigration judge determines that there is a 50% or greater chance that you will be tortured if returned to your home country, he must grant you relief under the CAT. (It is very important that your lawyer explains to you all these complicated differences! If you feel that your lawyer is not explaining this clearly, please contact RIF).
Work Authorization while in Court Proceedings
Some applicants are able to apply for a work authorization while waiting for their individual hearings. Figuring out who is eligible can be a little confusing, so please speak with your attorney about this before applying.
The following is a brief explanation of who is eligible:
There is something known as “the clock” in court proceedings. The clock counts the days from the time you are referred to court until the date you get a decision from the judge. If the clock reaches 150 days, you can apply for a work authorization. This might seem simple and uncomplicated, but the clock can and is stopped at many times. The clock is stopped if you ask the judge for more time to prepare your case. The clock continues to run if it is the government who causes delay in the process. So, for example, if you go to your first master calendar appointment and tell the judge that you need more time to find a lawyer, the clock stops. It has counted the days from the time you were referred to court until the date of your master calendar. The clock will restart on the date of your next master calendar if you are ready to proceed. The clock always continues to run if, for example, the government needs more time because it cannot locate your file, or if the judge, on the date of your first master calendar, gives you a date for your individual hearing that is more than 150 days away.
You can find out how much time you have on your clock by calling 1-800-898-7180.
Once again it is very important that your lawyer explains this clearly to you.
FOR COMPLETE ASYLUM FILING PROCEDURE: http://www.asylumhelp.org
Filed under: Asylum in the US, Human Rights, Laws, Social Engineering
July 21, 2008 • 7:26 pm 0
Maoist chairman warns ‘unholy alliance’ could jeopardise peace process
Maoist chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ has said the “unholy and unnatural alliance” of Nepali Congress, CPN-UML and Madhesi Janadhikar Forum (MJF) could put the peace process at stake.
Speaking to reporters at the CPN-M’s parliamentary party office in Singha Durbar Sunday afternoon, Dahal said that implementation of the 12-point agreement, and the constitution-making process would be seriously hampered if the new alliance sustained.
He also said his party has urged the parties to break the alliance, and that dialogue with the UML had already been initiated for this.
According to him, CPN (Unity Centre) general secretary Narayan Kaji Shrestha ‘Prakash’ met UML general secretary Jhala Nath Khanal today to convey the CPN-M’s tidings to which Khanal reacted positively.
The Maoist supremo revealed that his party had not decided whether to stake its claim for government’s leadership in the changed political equation. nepalnews.com mk July 20 08
Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Human Rights, Legal Development, Social Engineering
• 10:26 am 0
| THT Online |
| Kathmandu, July 21 – Nepali congress leader Dr Ram Baran Yadav has been elected the country’s first president. According to a source close to the office of election officer, Yadav secured 308 votes defeating Maoist candidate Ram Raja Prasad Singh. Of 594 members of the CA, 590 members voted today in a run-off to elect the country’s first president. Sources said that Singh got only 282 votes. The chair of the CA will make formal announcement shortly. Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala and CPN-Maoist Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal cast their votes in the presidential run-off at 9:45 am. Prachanda, in a pensive mood, told journalists, “The result of the president’s election will determine whether the new government will be formed under the leadership of the CPN-Maoist or not.” Among the heavyweights of the parties, general secretary of the CPN-UML Jhala Nath Khanal cast vote first at 8:45 am. After voting, Khanal said, “Nepali Congress candidate Dr. Ram Baran Yadav is sure to win the president’s re-polling.” “No one can break up the alliance among the three parties.” Hugging presidential candidate Dr. Yadav, Khanal said, “The CPN-Maoist betrayed the CPN-UML.” Similarly, president of the Madhesi Janaadhikar Forum (MJF) Upendra Yadav cast vote at 9:30 am. Yadav, who was waiting his turn to cast vote, said that the MJF will not betray the three-party consensus. Chairman of the Nepal Workers’ and Peasants’ Party (NWPP) Narayan Man Bijukchhe, whose party stayed out of Sunday’s election, cast vote at 9:45 am. Bijukchhe said he took part in the re-polling to give continuity to the politics of consensus and agreement. Though the re-polling kicked off at 8:15 am, constituent assembly members of the CPN-Maoist did not stay in queue until 8:45 am. Later, they cast votes after Maoist leader Agni Sapkota requested them to do so. 226 members of the Maoists, 114 of NC, 108 of UML, 52 of MJF, 21 of TMDP, 9 of CPN (ML), 8 of People’s Front Nepal, 9 of Sadbhavana Party, 5 of CPN (Unified), 4 of Rastriya Janamorcha, 5 of NWPP, 8 of RPP, each 3 of RJP and NSP(A) and each 2 of Janamukti Party, Janata Dal and Federal Democratic Forum, each one CA member of Socialist Democratic Party, Dalit Indigenous, Nepal Pariwar Dal, Newa Rastriya Party, Chure Bhavar Rastriya Ekta Party, and two independent CA members took part in voting. RPP-Nepal and CPN (United) boycotted the re-polling. The presidential election had to be re-scheduled for today after NC leader Dr Ram Baran Yadav, backed by the NC, CPN-UML and Madhesi Janaadhikar Forum (MJF), and Maoist candidate Ramraja Prasad Singh backed by Tarai-Madhes Democratic Party failed to secure a majority vote out of the existing 594 Constituent Assembly members during the first election on July 19. However, MJF leader Parmananda Jha won country’s first vice president securing 305 votes. |
Filed under: Human Rights
July 14, 2008 • 11:22 am 0
Source: http://www.samarmagazine.org/archive/article.php?id=244
An interview with Mahabir Chaudhari, a Nepali human rights defender now living in exile in New York. He explores the complexities and challenges faced by many migrants who have sought political asylum to escape Nepal’s over a decade-long civil war.
By Rob Verger
This piece originally appeared in Samar 27, published online November 12th, 2007.
If you visit the Subway sandwich shop on 85th street on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, you might meet one of the part-time employees there, Mahabir Chaudhari. He’s from rural western Nepal, is one of the founding members of an influential education and human rights organization in that country, and is living in the United States under political asylum.
The organization, called BASE, was founded by Dilli Chaudhari, a friend of Mahabir’s, and was officially born in 1991–although work towards creating BASE began in the 1980s. Mahabir was one of 35 founding members, most of whom were teenagers dedicated to bettering their education and rights. BASE stands for Backwards Society Education and works to help educate and advocate for people in Nepal who might be “backwards” in the sense that they are discriminated against or have poor access to essentials like education and health care. Today the organization has some 37,000 members. But because of Mahabir’s work with BASE, the Maoists, an armed rebel group fighting the Nepali government, threatened and pressured him to join the insurgency–and meanwhile, the Nepali government suspected him and other members of BASE of helping the Maoists. Caught between his own government and the people fighting that government, Mahabir eventually found his way to the U.S. But the road to political asylum and a new life in the U.S. is not an easy one.
On my way to meet Mahabir for the first time, I had walked past upscale clothing stores on Lexington Avenue, and thought that if there was a place that was more different than Nepal, one of the world’s poorest countries, this was it. Mahabir had just finished a shift at Subway, and we met on a street corner and walked to a nearby diner. He was wearing black pants, black shoes, and a long-sleeved grey T-shirt, and his black hair was neat and short. A phrase he frequently utters, I would learn, is “no problem.”
Mahabir, now 32, was born in the small village of Tulsi Pur, in the Dang District of western Nepal, one of six siblings. His mother was a bonded laborer and a farmer, and his father, who died when Mahabir was ten years old, owned two small stores and also worked as a local politician. Like most people in his village, Mahabir’s family was part of the Tharu ethnic group, which is one of the lower castes in Nepal. “All the Tharu people were discriminated against, so we had to fight for our rights,” Mahabir said, from his seat in the diner. Tharu people usually didn’t own their own land, and thus, like indentured servants, had to work for land owners for wages that might never allow them to become independent: it was a modern-day form of slavery. They also had poor access to education, health care and other services. The majority of Tharu people live in twenty-two districts in Nepal’s Terai region, the swath of jungle and plains that border India.
Mahabir talked about the process that began in the 1960s by which the Tharu people lost their land. His grandfather, who was illiterate, lost his land to a Brahmin because he could not read or understand the deed to the land. “There is thousands of story, because different family has a different story. All the Tharu lose their land, and they would become kamaiya,” Mahabir said, using the Nepali word for bonded laborer. Discrimination against the Tharu people was systematized.
“At that time, we were very, very, very poor,” he added, speaking of his childhood. “Still my mother was working as a bonded laborer. After my father, he worked very hard, made some money, he had some business… After then, we did buy some land.” He added, “Even sometime we didn’t have enough food to eat.” Eventually his father paid off his mother’s debts, and she was released.
It was because of this discrimination against Tharus that BASE was born. Mahabir and other BASE members also worked specifically to advocate for an end to the kamaiya system, helping the kamaiya community fundraise and organize. Eventually, a large peaceful movement swept the districts. Their efforts and demonstrations were recognized in July of 2000 when the Nepali government legally eliminated the kamaiya system. After that, the newly-freed kamaiya had very little possessions and no place to go, and Mahabir and many others worked on the enormous task of helping them resettle.
Although BASE had widespread grassroots support, daily life grew more complicated after the Maoist insurgency began in 1996, triggering a war that ultimately claimed more than 11,000 lives and was especially destructive in western Nepal. (In November of 2006, the rebels and the government signed a peace treaty and a U.N. mission locked up the weapons, but today there is still political uncertainty and general instability in Nepal). As the Maoists grew in strength, they pressured BASE members to join, and some did, but Mahabir and other leaders refused to cooperate with the rebels, disagreeing with their violent methods.
“After we disagree with Maoists, we cannot collaborate with them, we cannot work with them, they force our member to join the Maoists,” Mahabir said. “And some member they were beaten, some member they were kidnapped, and they bombed a couple of office more than ten times.” Meanwhile, the Nepali government accused BASE members of working with the Maoists, and searched BASE offices. In 2002, despite protests from members, the government refused to renew BASE’s registration–but changed its mind after former U.S. President Jimmy Carter wrote a letter to the Prime Minister of Nepal on BASE’s behalf.
“We were in the middle at that time. That was a very hard time,” Mahabir said.
Today, Mahabir lives in Ridgewood, Queens, with his wife, Neera Chaudhari, 31, and his sons, Sabin, 12, and Samir, 7. The other three families in his building are all Nepali, and a short walk away are two large apartment buildings, occupied almost entirely by Nepali families. (As the conflict increased in Nepal, more and more Nepalis have had incentive to leave, relocating to India, the Middle East, and New York City, among other places). I visited Mahabir in his apartment 11 days after we first met, and we sat down at a small table. Music and car horns from the street filtered up through the open windows as we spoke.
Mahabir wore a sharp blue collared shirt, black pants, and a thin gold chain from Nepal around his neck. Sabin and Samir played quietly in the next room. He spoke further of the process of violence and intimidation that led to his eventual move to the U.S. I asked him why, specifically, he did not want to be a part of the Maoists’ violent methods. “We believe in the peaceful way, because the violence way never solve the problem,” he said, adding, “if you beat somebody, of course somebody will beat you too.”
The situation continued to deteriorate for Mahabir and other BASE members. In 2001, Maoists stopped him and confiscated his motorcycle. In the following years, members of BASE (and some friends of Mahabir’s) were killed by government soldiers on suspicion of being Maoists, and others were killed by the Maoists under suspicion that they were working with the government. “From both side we were in danger at that time,” he said.
In early 2003, Maoists bombed a BASE office in a village called Dhangadhi where Mahabir was part of a meeting. “We were in the BASE office, at night because we had a meeting, some people they came from the village, and they were staying in the office, and I was there too… and they bombed… The office boy he was injured little bit, and he cut his hand, but nobody died,” he said. Damage to the office was light. “We called the police, at night, but they didn’t show up. They came only the next morning, like seven, eight o’clock. And that time, I thought, I’m in danger. That time I was scared very, very much, but I didn’t have any option. I cannot go to other village.” (Later, when Mahabir was in the U.S. in 2004, the same office was destroyed in another bombing).
In the summer of 2003, Mahabir got a position as a counselor at a summer camp that focused on international leadership sponsored by the Louis August Jonas Foundation and located in upstate New York. While there, he realized that it might not be safe for him to return to Nepal, applied for an extension to his visa (which he received) and then began learning about political asylum. Through the help of a friend at an organization called Global Youth Connect, as well as support from Human Rights First, Mahabir began the process of applying. He eventually ran out of time and filed the asylum papers himself. But he was rejected and referred to an immigration court. Human Rights First put him in touch with Brooklyn Law School, where lawyers helped him try again. In April of 2005 he found out that he had been granted asylum. “At that time I was quite happy,” he said. Mahabir had to wait more than a year before his family could join him, which they did, in July of 2006.
According the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the number of people granted asylum from Nepal has increased sharply in the past decade. In 1997, only three Nepalis were granted asylum, and in 1998 there were only 26. But in 2005 there were 316, and in 2006 there were 373.
While he was gone from Nepal, violence and tension continued in and around Tulsi Pur, Mahabir’s village, as well as in many other spots across Nepal. “When I came here, they went two or three times to look for me,” Mahabir said. “When they didn’t find, they were crazy. One time, they beat my mom. My mom was beaten.” He added, “They asked her to ask me to come back.” She was hospitalized. Word reached Mahabir what had happened. “It was very hard to me to hear that. I called my mom and at that time she was unable to speak very well.”
Even though he is far from the physical danger now, life in the U.S. is hard for Mahabir and his family, as it is for so many immigrants. “I wanted to wish it will be peace in Nepal…and I’d go back, and I start my own career, to be a social leader,” he said. He is able to work on BASE’s behalf from here some, and he also volunteers for Global Youth Connect. But he feels that his real work is in Nepal. And despite the fact that he has a job and a family here in the U.S., his thoughts are still in Nepal, and he worries about his mother. “For five years, I haven’t met my mom… four or five years… that’s a long time,” he said, then paused. “She’s getting older and older.”
To learn more about BASE, contact Mahabir at dahitmahabir at yahoo.com
Rob Verger is an Instructor in the University Writing Program at Columbia University as well as a graduate student there. His writing has also appeared in the Boston Globe. In the spring of 2000, he studied abroad in Nepal with the School for International Training. Contact him at robverger at gmail.com.
Filed under: Asylum in the US
July 11, 2008 • 12:11 pm 0
To,
Nepal Bar Council
Ram Shah Path, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Honorable Chairman,
ANLUS has serious concern over news published in www.khojtalashonline.com on 10th July issue regarding the Limbuwan court where Chabi Sambahamphe, an advocate licensed by Nepal Bar council has been practicing Unauthorized Practice of Law. Appropriate action has to be taken.
Association of Nepalese Lawyers and Scholars in the United States
web site: www.anlus.org email : anlusnepal@gmail.com
Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Laws, Legal Development, Social Engineering, Young Lawyers, कानून नेपाल
MINDS @ WORK