LawNepal

Icon

The Law is above the King ! Site Maintained by Advocate Santosh Giri, LLM (US/Nepal) | Specialization : Human Rights Law of Nepal [CAT, ICERD, ICESCR, ICCPR, CEDAW, Regional and International Instruments] | Freelance Media Monitoring on Human Rights, Legal Development and Violation of Human Rights in Nepal.

PERSECUTION DURING ELECTIONS in Nepal

DISTRICTS PERSECUTION DURING ELECTIONS

Sarlahi        Independent Candidate shot dead
Sunsari        NC cadre shot dead, 7 injured
Lalitpur    Young Communist League captures booth
Lalitpur    YCL abducts voters
Rautahat    15 voters injured by maoists
Bajhang        Maoists attack UML members
Dhanusha    Maoists fire at NC leader
Arghakhachi    Maoists torch ballot boxed and booth
Gorkha        Maoist capture all booths
Sindhupalchowk    Maoists capture all booths
Mahottari    Maoists kills one and 2 injured
Ramechhap    YCL captures booth
Sindhupalchowk    YCL attacks RPP chairman
Nawalparasi    Voting ends due to fear
Sunsari        Election commission employees abducted
Dhanusha    Independent candidate shot dead
Dang        Maoists attask ex-minister, 7 maoists killed
Baglung        Maoists attack UML cadres
Chitwan        4 maoists arrested with sharp weapons
Rupandehi    Maoists arrested with weapons
Kavrepalanchowk    Maoist take pictures of voters and threat
Rautahat    3 injured in bomb blast
Rukum        6 NC members attacked
Surkhet        Candidate murdered
Butwal        31 armed YCL men arrested
Mahottari    Polls suspended
Siraha        Polls suspended
Sarlahi        Polls suspended
Chitwan        Polls suspended

Dolakha         Booth captured

TOTAL VOTERS TURN OUT = 50 TO 60% NATIONWIDE

Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Human Rights, Maoist's Terror

FREE POLLS IN NEPAL?

THIS IS WHAT THE POLL DAY NEWS LOOKS LIKE…

Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Failed Leaders, Human Rights, Maoist's Terror

MAOIST’S TERRORISM VIOLATING THE ELECTION CODE OF CONDUCT

MAOIST’S TERRORISM VIOLATING THE ELECTION CODE OF CONDUCT
  March 03, 2008 till March 18, 2008  
DATES INCIDENT VICTIM DISTRICTS
3-Mar JTMM Bombing Nepali Congress Party Banke
6-Mar YCL Thrashes Innocent woman Sankhuwasabha
7-Mar JTMM sets fire to vehicle Press-Kantipur Publications Saptari
8-Mar CPNM attacks Police Post Security Agency Rasuwa
  CPNM obstructs party leader Rastriya Prajatantra Party RPP Sindhupalchowk
  Terai Liberation Front abducts candidate Jana Morcha Party Kapilbastu
  Akhil Terai Mukti Morcha sets fire to a vehicle Press-Kantipur Publications Saptari
9-Mar CPNM harasses poll campaigns Other parties Dadeldhura
  CPNM abducts party members United Marxist Leninist Manang
12-Mar CPNM attack party members United Marxist Leninist Ramechap
13-Mar JTMM (J) kills one Civilians Bara
14-Mar YCL abducts candidate Nepali Congress Party Surkhet
15-Mar YCL threatens to kill party members Nepali Congress Party Rukum
  YCL warns public not to support others Civilians Rukum
  YCL beats party members United Marxist Leninist Kaski
  CPNM beats party members Nepal Workers and Peasents Party Bhaktapur
16-Mar CPNM shoots a party member Nepali Congress Party Okhaldhunga
  CPNM manhandles party members Nepali Congress Party Gorkha
  4000 CPNM soldiers desert camps Civilians Nationwide
18-Mar CPNm displaces a family Civilians Kalikot

Filed under: Failed Leaders, Human Rights, Maoist's Terror

Article Published in ‘JURIST’

Nepal in transition: abolishing the monarchy
Santosh Giri [advocate/human rights lawyer, Supreme Court of Nepal]: “The abolition of Nepal’s nearly 240-year-old monarchy and declaration of Nepal as a “federal, democratic, republican state” was made by an overwhelming majority in the interim parliament late last month. 270 members in the 329-member House of Representatives voted on December 27, 2007 in favor of ending the monarchy (3 pro-monarchists cast against the motion while the rest abstained). However, Nepal will become a republic only after the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly, which is due to be elected by mid-April next year. The decision also serves to put the peace process back on track and paves the way for elections notwithstanding the fact that elections have been postponed three times since June 2006. Constituent Assembly seats has been increased from 497 to 601, of which 335 (58%) will be elected on the basis of proportional representation, with 240 to be directly elected and 26 to be nominated by the country’s cabinet.

Filed under: A Lawless Scoiety, Failed Leaders, Gyanendra, Human Rights, Laws, Legal Development, Maoist's Terror, Mediation/Arbitration, Social Engineering, Young Lawyers, कानून नेपाल

Steps and Time Line of Asylum Process- www.uscis.gov

How Long Does the Process Take?
The time frames below apply only if you will be scheduled for an interview at one of the eight asylum offices. Time frames vary for those who live far from an asylum office because asylum officers must travel to other offices in order to conduct the long-distance interviews.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides in Section 208(d)(5) that the initial interview on asylum applications filed on or after April 1, 1997 should take place within 45 days after the date the application is filed, and a decision should be made on the asylum application within 180 days after the date the application is filed, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

 

Applicant files I-589 at the Service Center

  • The filing date is the date the complete application was received at the Service Center.

Within 21 days of the filing date

Applicant receives:

  • Receipt notice that USCIS received I-589
  • Fingerprint appointment notice
  • Interview notice

Within 43 days of the filing date

  • Applicant is interviewed at one of the eight asylum offices, unless applicant lives at a significant distance from an asylum office.

Within 60 days of the filing date

  • Majority of applicants return two weeks after the interview to pick up the decisions on their application, including referrals to the Immigration Court for final determination

Within 180 days of the filing date

  • Applicants whose cases have been referred to the Immigration Court receive a decision on their applications.

Filed under: Asylum in the US, Human Rights, Immigratoin Reform, Justice, Laws, Legal Development, Maoist's Terror, Social Engineering, Young Lawyers, कानून नेपाल

Types and Processes of Asylum Decision-www.uscis.gov

Decisions On Asylum Claims

How Will the Asylum Officer Make the Decision About Whether To Grant Me Asylum?
The Asylum Officer will evaluate your testimony, the information you provide on your application, and any supplementary materials you submit to determine if you are a refugee and whether any mandatory bars apply. The Asylum Officer will consider country condition information from reliable sources and will consider the relevant law found in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the regulations found in Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and case law. The Asylum Officer will also evaluate the credibility of your claim. See 8 CFR § 208.9. When Will I Be Notified About the Decision on My Asylum Claim?
In most cases, you will return to the asylum office where your interview was held two weeks after the interview to pick up your decision. However, there may be longer processing times if you were interviewed at a district office, are currently in valid status, or if your case will be reviewed by Asylum Division Headquarters staff. You will generally receive the decision by mail if any of these circumstances occur. What Will Be My Status After I Am Granted Asylum?
You will have asylee status. You will receive an I-94 Arrival and Departure record documenting that you are able to remain indefinitely in the United States as an asylee. You will be authorized to work in the United States for as long as you remain in asylee status. You may obtain a photo-identity document from USCIS evidencing your employment authorization by applying for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD). You will also be able to request derivative asylum status for any spouse or child (unmarried and under 21 years of age as of the date you filed the asylum application, as long as your asylum application was pending on or after August 6, 2002) who was not included as a dependent in your asylum decision and with whom you have a qualifying relationship. This means that you will be able to petition to bring your spouse and/or children to the United States, or allow them to remain in the United States indefinitely incident to your asylee status. To What Benefits May I Be Entitled After I Am Granted Asylum?
Asylees are eligible to apply for certain benefits, including an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), an unrestricted Social Security card, cash and medical assistance, employment assistance, and a Refugee Travel Document. For more information on the benefits and responsibilities associated with asylee status, see Types of Decisions, Grant of Asylum, or information for asylees on the website of the Office of Refugee Resettlement. Can Asylum Status Be Terminated?
Yes. Your asylee status may be terminated if you no longer have a well-founded fear of persecution because of a fundamental change in circumstances, you have obtained protection from another country, or you have committed certain crimes or engaged in other activity that makes you ineligible to retain asylum status in the United States. See INA § 208(c)(2). An asylee is not a lawful permanent resident. You may apply for lawful permanent resident status after you have been physically present in the United States for a period of one year after the date you were granted asylum status. See Asylee Adjustment for more information about becoming a lawful permanent resident. The law can be found at INA § 209(b). What is a Recommended Approval of Asylum?
You will receive a recommended approval of asylum if an Asylum Officer has made a preliminary determination to grant you asylum, but USCIS has not received the results from the mandatory, confidential investigation of your identity and background. If the results reveal derogatory information that affects your eligibility for asylum, USCIS may deny your request for asylum or refer it to an Immigration Judge for further consideration. See Recommended Approval. What is a Conditional Grant of Asylum?
Prior to the passage of the Real ID Act of 2005, applicants who were found eligible for asylum based on past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution solely on account of resistance to a coercive population control (CPC) program were subject to a 1,000-per-year statutory limit on grants of asylum based on CPC, and were given a conditional grant until a final approval authorization number bacame available within the annual 1,000 cap. Section 101(g)(2) of the Real ID Act of 2005 eliminated this annual 1,000 cap, and asylum offices have heen issuing final, as opposed to conditional, asylum approvals to new, qualified applicants whose asylum claims are based solely on CPC, as well as to applicants who had previously been given a conditional grant, provided that they clear background check requirements and otherwise qualify for asylum status. See Resistance to Coercive Population Control (CPC) Programs for more information. What is a Notice of Intent to Deny?
You will receive a Notice of Intent to Deny if you are currently in valid status and found ineligible for asylum. You will have 16 days to provide a response to the letter. The Asylum Officer will then either approve or deny the claim. See Notice of Intent to Deny. What is a Final Denial?
You will receive a Final Denial of your asylum claim if you received a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) and either did not provide a response to the letter within 16 days, or the Asylum Officer determined that the evidence or argument you provided failed to overcome the grounds for denial as stated in the NOID. See Final Denial. What Does It Mean to be Referred to Immigration Court?
This means that the Asylum Officer was unable to approve your asylum application and you are not currently in valid status. You will receive charging documents that place you in removal proceedings in Immigration Court. Your asylum application will be referred to the Immigration Court for an Immigration Judge to decide during the removal proceedings. See Referral to an Immigration Court. Where Can I Find Further Information if My Asylum Claim is Referred to Immigration Court?
The Immigration Courts are located within the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the U.S. Department of Justice. Information about the Immigration Courts can be found at www.usdoj.gov/eoir or you can call their electronic information system at 1-800-898-7180. You will need your A-number to get information on your case. This telephonic information system can give you information about your next hearing date, time and location; elapsed time and status of the clock for asylum cases; Immigration Judge decision information; case appeal information, including appeal due date, brief due date, date forwarded to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and BIA decision and decision date. If the Immigration Judge denies your asylum application, you will receive a notice telling you how to appeal the decision.

Generally, you may appeal within 30 days of receiving the denial. After your appeal form and a required fee are processed, the appeal will be referred to the Board of Immigration Appeals in Washington, DC. For more information, see the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s website at www.usdoj.gov/eoir.

Other

Do I Need to Notify USCIS If I Move?
See How Do I Report a Change of Address to USCIS?You must also notify in writing the local asylum office where you case is pending of any change of address. Please see “Change of Address” on your local asylum office page for more information: Arlington, VA; Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Newark, NJ (Lyndhurst); New York, NY (Rosedale); and San Francisco, CA.

The regulation pertaining to change of address can be found at 8 CFR 265.1.

Special note for class members of the American Baptist Churches V. Thornburgh (ABC) settlement agreement: ABC class members are instructed to follow the same procedures as all other asylum applicants for reporting a change of address. See How Do I Report a Change of Address to USCIS? Please note, on November 30, 2005, the ABC Project Post Office Box was officially closed and use of Form I-855, ABC Change of Address Form, discontinued. Any mail sent to the ABC Project Post Office Box will be returned to sender if the mail contains a return address, or destroyed if it does not. See USCIS Announces New Address Change Procedures for ABC Class Members and Follow-Up Message: USCIS Announces New Address Change Procedures for ABC Class Members (11/30/05).

How Can I Find Out About the Status of My Application?
There are two ways to find the status of a pending asylum application: you may write to the Asylum Office having jurisdiction over your case or you may visit the Asylum Office where your case is pending. You should be prepared to provide the following information:

  1. Alien number (“A-Number”)
  2. Current legal name and, if different, the name as it appears on the application
  3. Nationality
  4. Date of birth
  5. Current address
  6. Date of interview, if applicable

If you are sending your request in writing, you should sign the request and mark your envelope: ATTN: Status Inquiry. The eight asylum offices are located at: Arlington, VA; Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; Miami, FL; Newark, NJ (Lyndhurst); New York, NY (Rosedale); and San Francisco, CA. Will I Be Able To Petition To Bring My Family To The United States?
If you are granted asylum, you may request derivative asylum status for any spouse or child (unmarried and under 21 years of age as of the date you filed the asylum application was pending on or after August 6, 2002) who was not included in your asylum claim and with whom you have a qualifying relationship. You must submit a Form I-730, Refugee and Asylee Relative Petition, to the Nebraska Service Center, P.O. Box 87730, Lincoln, NE 68501-7730. The Form I-730 must be filed for each qualifying family member within 2 years of the date you were granted asylum status, unless USCIS determines that this time period should be extended for humanitarian reasons. See How Do I Get My Spouse or Children Derivative Asylum Status in the United States? When Can I Apply To Become a Lawful Permanent Resident?
You may apply for lawful permanent resident status under INA § 209(b) after you have been physically present in the United States for a period of one year after the date you were granted asylum status. To apply for lawful permanent resident status, you must submit a separate Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, for yourself and each qualifying family member to the Nebraska Service Center, P.O. Box 87485, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68501-7485. See Asylee Adjustment. Will I Get a Work Permit?
Asylum applicants cannot apply for employment authorization at the same time they apply for asylum. You will be authorized to work in the United States if you are granted asylum and as long as you remain in asylum status. You are also eligible to apply for employment authorization if you have been given a recommended approval or conditional grant of asylum. You can also apply for work authorization before a decision is made on your claim if 150 days has passed since you filed your complete application with the Service Center and no decision has been made on your application. USCIS has 30 days to either grant or deny your request for employment. The application to apply for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) is the Form I-765. Please see Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, and How Do I Get a Work Permit? for more information.

If you are granted asylum before an Immigration Judge and need information on work authorization, see “Notice to Individuals Granted Immigration Benefits by Immigration Judge or Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)”.

Effective November 10, 2002, asylum applicants who have been granted asylum will no longer have to file an EAD application with the Nebraska Service Center in order to obtain an initial EAD. Section 309 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 requires USCIS to issue an employment authorization document containing at least a fingerprint and photograph to an asylee immediately upon a grant of asylum. If an asylee wishes to renew his or her EAD, the asylee will still need to submit an EAD application with the Nebraska Service Center, and pay a fee or request a fee waiver under 8 CFR § 103.7(c). However, asylees are work-authorized regardless of whether or not they are in possession of an EAD. An asylee may want to obtain an EAD from USCIS in order to meet other obligations. For example, the EAD, which is evidence of both identity and employment authorization, can be presented to an employer as a List A document of the Employment Eligibility Verification form (Form I-9). Also, the EAD can serve as evidence of alien registration, which is required by law to be carried by registered aliens at all times.

Can I Travel Outside the United States?
If you are applying for asylum and want to travel outside the United States, you must receive advance permission before you leave the United States in order to return to the United States. This advance permission is called Advance Parole. If you do not apply for Advance Parole before you leave the country, you will be presumed to have abandoned your application with USCIS and you may not be permitted to return to the United States. If you obtain advance parole and return to your country of feared persecution, you will be presumed to have abandoned your asylum request, unless you can show compelling reasons for the return. If your application for asylum is approved, you may apply for a Refugee Travel Document. This document will allow you to travel abroad and return to the United States. For more information on both Advance Parole and Refugee Travel Documents, see How Do I Get a Travel Document? and Form I-131, Application for Travel Document.

How Does the Asylum Program Assure Quality and Consistency in its Asylum Decisions?
The Asylum Program assures the quality of its programs through its Quality Assurance and Training Branch by:

  1. conducting a mandatory and comprehensive 5-week training program on asylum law, interviewing skills and analysis (Asylum Officer Basic Training Course) for all incoming asylum officers
  2. requiring 100% review of all asylum decisions by a Supervisory Asylum Officer
  3. placing one or more Quality and Assurance Trainers in every Asylum Office to conduct training programs, observe asylum interviews, and review decisions
  4. setting aside 4 hours every week for in-house training in the asylum offices
  5. requiring Asylum Division Headquarters review of certain cases
  6. conducting supervisory training programs

Filed under: Asylum in the US, Human Rights, Immigratoin Reform, Justice, Laws, Legal Development, Maoist's Terror, Social Engineering, Young Lawyers, कानून नेपाल

The need for truce

Amidst present chaos and ongoing agitation, theres nothing as important as peace, truce, talks and a broad consenses among all including the king, parties, maoists and above all the supreme people of the himalayan kingdom of Nepal.

All these years, the people were neglected by the king, by the parties and of course by the maoists 'the so called peoples war'. People, the Nepalese were dominated, supressed, exploited and exploited at every point of our history.

take for instance the divide and rule theory of king jayasthiti malla in ancient nepal who adopted the caste system from india and forced it on the nepali society. Ever since, we can definetely say, people were exploited by the state. Then comes the unification of nepal phase where, the people were once again disregarded in the course of national integrity. The principalities were adjoined to forma  new nation but the ongoing tradition of difference between different state's cultural practices were abruptly dropped. people were forced to follow the 'one' religion of hinduism.

Likewise the 104 years of Rana regime is the worst phase in the history of Nepalese people exploitation. People were treated as 'things' and slavery fostered . Education for normal people was considered as a crime and even severely punished.

the 1950 movement of democracy was a matter of india's interest alongside some leaders of some leading parties already exiled in india. Even the king had been exiled by then. The people who had been following a 'slavery' life were not in a place o deciede for themselves. Education, literacy and awareness was the at the least . A handful of leaders, expressed their views as the people's view and stared a 10 year unsuccessful rule of democracy which was indeed a 'partycracy'.

The failure of partycracy resulted in yet another opperessing regime of the then king mahendra. people, by now were denied straightaway from fundamental human rights. Life standard of normal people was degrading everyday. the gap between the poor and the rich was widening every day in the veil of beaureacratic corruption protected by the state.

The 1990 movement was finally declared as a full democracy by again a handfull leaders. Within years, corruption by these parties crossed limites. The ill political practice of Bihar and uttar pradesh of India was adopted and ratified by our leaders, reasulting in failure of elected popular will four times in a matter of ten years. Dissolution of parliament and mid-term election had become a regular threat and a last resort whenever a party's leadership government was at stake. During this time, leaders and parliamentarians were even bargained as poultry animals in order to pass a vote of non-confidence against a ruling party. people, at this time, were never subject to a primary concern.

this led finally to a failure of he parliamentary system as the maoists waged war against the uling party. it must be noted that the 'people's war' was targetted against the ruling party and not the then king! In 2002 when the parliament was dissolved, this led to series of hide and seek between different parties in terms of heading the government.

Filed under: Failed Leaders, Gyanendra, Human Rights, Laws, Legal Development, Maoist's Terror, Partycracy

Thank You All

  • 99,434 readers from 176 nations

Stakeholders

Swine Flu Info

RSS Unknown Feed

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

CLIMATE CHANGE

Brighter Planet's 350 Challenge
Swine Flu Info

Blog value


My blog is worth $2,822.70.
How much is your blog worth?

RESEARCH

Contact for research on any Nepal issues, political development and for the news and events related to the politics of Nepal.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this Site is for general guidance based on information available in the internet on several matters discussed. THE AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG IS NOT LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES. The author is only licensed to practice law in Nepal. The application and impact of laws can vary widely based on the specific facts involved. Given the changing nature of laws, rules and regulations, and the updating immigration policies, there may be delays, omissions or inaccuracies in information contained in this Site. Accordingly, the information on this Site is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal, accounting, tax, or other professional advice and services. As such, it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting, tax, legal or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult a professional such as an Immigration law Attorney or related professionals for other subject matters. All information in this Site is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event will the author and the organizations the author is involved in will be thereof be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this Site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Certain links in this Site connect to other Web Sites maintained by third parties over whom the author has no control. Author and/or this blog and related author’s blogs or sites makes no representations as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other Web Sites.

 

November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

SocialVibe


LawNepal-Twit